The intensive software of nanomaterials within the meals trade has raised issues about their potential dangers to human well being. Nonetheless, restricted information can be found on the organic security of nanomaterials in meals, particularly on the epigenetic stage. This research examined the implications of two sorts of artificial amorphous silica (SAS), food-grade precipitated silica (S200) and fumed silica Aerosil 200F (A200F), that are nanorange meals components. After 28-day steady and intermittent subacute publicity to those SAS by way of eating regimen, whole-genome methylation ranges in mouse peripheral leukocytes and liver had been considerably altered in a dose- and SAS type-dependent method, with minimal toxicity detected by standard toxicological assessments, particularly at a human-relevant dose (HRD). The 84-day steady subchronic publicity to all doses of S200 and A200F induced liver steatosis the place S200 collected within the liver even at HRD. Genome-wide DNA methylation sequencing revealed that the differentially methylated areas induced by each SAS had been primarily situated within the intron, intergenic, and promoter areas after 84-day high-dose steady publicity. Bioinformatics evaluation of differentially methylated genes indicated that publicity to S200 or A200F could result in lipid metabolism issues and most cancers growth. Pathway validation experiments indicated each SAS varieties as doubtlessly carcinogenic. Whereas S200 inhibited the p53-mediated apoptotic pathway in mouse liver, A200F activated the HRAS-mediated MAPK signaling pathway, which is a key driver of hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus, warning have to be paid to the danger of long-term publicity to food-grade SAS, and epigenetic parameters ought to be included as finish factors in the course of the danger evaluation of food-grade nanomaterials.